Tue Mar 14 10:47:23 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Slony1-commit] By cbbrowne: It wasn't clear to a Gentle Reader that TRUNCATE is not a
- Next message: [Slony1-commit] By cbbrowne: Explain logging levels (-d option) for slon a bit better
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Log Message:
-----------
Note in slon documentation the downside to using the "lag interval"
Modified Files:
--------------
slony1-engine/doc/adminguide:
slon.sgml (r1.25 -> r1.26)
-------------- next part --------------
Index: slon.sgml
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/slony1/slony1-engine/doc/adminguide/slon.sgml,v
retrieving revision 1.25
retrieving revision 1.26
diff -Ldoc/adminguide/slon.sgml -Ldoc/adminguide/slon.sgml -u -w -r1.25 -r1.26
--- doc/adminguide/slon.sgml
+++ doc/adminguide/slon.sgml
@@ -342,6 +342,16 @@
causes events to be ignored until they reach the age
corresponding to the interval.
</para>
+
+ <warning><para> There is a concommittant downside to this lag;
+ events that require all nodes to synchronize, as typically
+ happens with <xref linkend="stmtfailover"> and <xref
+ linkend="stmtmoveset">, will have to wait for this lagging
+ node. </para>
+
+ <para> That might not be ideal behaviour at failover time, or at
+ the time when you want to run <xref
+ linkend="stmtddlscript">. </para></warning>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
- Previous message: [Slony1-commit] By cbbrowne: It wasn't clear to a Gentle Reader that TRUNCATE is not a
- Next message: [Slony1-commit] By cbbrowne: Explain logging levels (-d option) for slon a bit better
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-commit mailing list