Mon Jun 19 11:13:08 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Slony1-commit] By cbbrowne: Slonik usage documentation: Recommend usage of "preamble
- Next message: [Slony1-commit] By cbbrowne: Various improvements to Best Practices section...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Log Message: ----------- Add "best practices" based on recent activities Modified Files: -------------- slony1-engine/doc/adminguide: bestpractices.sgml (r1.18 -> r1.19) -------------- next part -------------- Index: bestpractices.sgml =================================================================== RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/slony1/slony1-engine/doc/adminguide/bestpractices.sgml,v retrieving revision 1.18 retrieving revision 1.19 diff -Ldoc/adminguide/bestpractices.sgml -Ldoc/adminguide/bestpractices.sgml -u -w -r1.18 -r1.19 --- doc/adminguide/bestpractices.sgml +++ doc/adminguide/bestpractices.sgml @@ -132,8 +132,8 @@ local network as the node that it is servicing, as it does a <emphasis>lot</emphasis> of communications with its database. </para> -<para> In theory, the <quote>best</quote> speed would come from -running the &lslon; on the database server that it is +<para> In theory, the <quote>best</quote> speed might be expected to +come from running the &lslon; on the database server that it is servicing. </para> <para> In practice, having the &lslon; processes strewn across a dozen @@ -151,6 +151,28 @@ <para> That also has the implication that configuration data and configuration scripts only need to be maintained in one place, eliminating duplication of configuration efforts.</para> + +</listitem> + +<listitem><para> &lslon; processes should run in the same +<quote>network context</quote> as the node that each is responsible +for managing so that the connection to that node is a +<quote>local</quote> one. Do <emphasis>not</emphasis> run such links +across a WAN. </para> + +<para> A WAN outage can leave database connections +<quote>zombied</quote>, and typical TCP/IP behaviour will allow those +connections to persist for around two hours. If such a connection is +the <quote>master</quote> connection which &slony1; uses to identify +which &lslon; is managing the node, you will have the situation where +the original &lslon; dies, due to the WAN outage, and subsequent +&lslon;s will be unable to connect for the next two hours until that +<quote>master</quote> connection times out. </para> + +<para> It is not difficult to remedy this; you need only <command>kill +SIGINT</command> the offending backend connection. But by running the +&lslon; locally, you will generally not be vulnerable to this +condition. </para> </listitem> <listitem> @@ -427,6 +449,23 @@ <para> The notes on <link linkend="usingslonik"> Using Slonik </link> describe some of the lessons learned from managing large numbers of <xref linkend="slonik"> scripts.</para> + +<para> Notable principles that have fallen out of generating many +slonik scripts are that: + +<itemizedlist> + +<listitem><para>Using <quote>preamble</quote> files is +<emphasis>highly recommended</emphasis> as it means that you use +heavily-verified preambles over and over.</para></listitem> + +<listitem><para>Any opportunity that you have to automatically +generate configuration whether by drawing it from a database or by +using a script that generates repetitively similar elements will help +prevent human error.</para></listitem> + +</itemizedlist> +</para> </listitem> <listitem><para> Handling Very Large Replication Sets </para>
- Previous message: [Slony1-commit] By cbbrowne: Slonik usage documentation: Recommend usage of "preamble
- Next message: [Slony1-commit] By cbbrowne: Various improvements to Best Practices section...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-commit mailing list