Fri Dec 1 15:16:27 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Slony1-commit] By cbbrowne: Fix typo in admin guide pointed out by Dan Langille
- Next message: [Slony1-commit] By devrim: - On 64-bit boxes, both 32 and 64 bit -devel packages may be
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Log Message:
-----------
Add in a step to release checklist, to verify that the function
upgradeSchema() (src/backend/slony1_funcs.sql) has all the latest sets of
Slony-I versions.
Modified Files:
--------------
slony1-engine/doc/adminguide:
releasechecklist.sgml (r1.6 -> r1.7)
-------------- next part --------------
Index: releasechecklist.sgml
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/slony1/slony1-engine/doc/adminguide/releasechecklist.sgml,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -Ldoc/adminguide/releasechecklist.sgml -Ldoc/adminguide/releasechecklist.sgml -u -w -r1.6 -r1.7
--- doc/adminguide/releasechecklist.sgml
+++ doc/adminguide/releasechecklist.sgml
@@ -78,6 +78,14 @@
<filename>configure</filename>; we shouldn't be tracking this in CVS.
</para>
+<listitem><para> One test that seems inherently troublesome to
+automate is the set of version numbers listed in upgradeSchema() in
+src/backend/slony1_funcs.sql. </para>
+
+<para> As new versions are released, the lists of version numbers will
+need to get changed; this does not seem amenable to much
+automation. </para> </listitem>
+
<listitem><para>make sure that the generated files from .l and .y are
created, for example <filename>slony/conf-file.[ch]</filename> </para>
- Previous message: [Slony1-commit] By cbbrowne: Fix typo in admin guide pointed out by Dan Langille
- Next message: [Slony1-commit] By devrim: - On 64-bit boxes, both 32 and 64 bit -devel packages may be
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-commit mailing list