Fri Dec 1 15:16:27 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Slony1-commit] By cbbrowne: Fix typo in admin guide pointed out by Dan Langille
- Next message: [Slony1-commit] By devrim: - On 64-bit boxes, both 32 and 64 bit -devel packages may be
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Log Message: ----------- Add in a step to release checklist, to verify that the function upgradeSchema() (src/backend/slony1_funcs.sql) has all the latest sets of Slony-I versions. Modified Files: -------------- slony1-engine/doc/adminguide: releasechecklist.sgml (r1.6 -> r1.7) -------------- next part -------------- Index: releasechecklist.sgml =================================================================== RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/slony1/slony1-engine/doc/adminguide/releasechecklist.sgml,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -Ldoc/adminguide/releasechecklist.sgml -Ldoc/adminguide/releasechecklist.sgml -u -w -r1.6 -r1.7 --- doc/adminguide/releasechecklist.sgml +++ doc/adminguide/releasechecklist.sgml @@ -78,6 +78,14 @@ <filename>configure</filename>; we shouldn't be tracking this in CVS. </para> +<listitem><para> One test that seems inherently troublesome to +automate is the set of version numbers listed in upgradeSchema() in +src/backend/slony1_funcs.sql. </para> + +<para> As new versions are released, the lists of version numbers will +need to get changed; this does not seem amenable to much +automation. </para> </listitem> + <listitem><para>make sure that the generated files from .l and .y are created, for example <filename>slony/conf-file.[ch]</filename> </para>
- Previous message: [Slony1-commit] By cbbrowne: Fix typo in admin guide pointed out by Dan Langille
- Next message: [Slony1-commit] By devrim: - On 64-bit boxes, both 32 and 64 bit -devel packages may be
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-commit mailing list