Thu Jan 27 11:15:55 PST 2011
- Previous message: [Slony1-bugs] [Bug 193] VACUUM works more frequency than vac_frequency?
- Next message: [Slony1-bugs] [Bug 193] VACUUM works more frequency than vac_frequency?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
http://www.slony.info/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193 --- Comment #2 from Christopher Browne <cbbrowne at ca.afilias.info> 2011-01-27 11:15:55 PST --- (In reply to comment #1) > Chris, > > this changed in 2.0 with commit 1fc90ac0939f6fa5c6f4f3bafee1d672aef6df51 > > I'm thinking that the reset of the vac_count SHOULD be in 2.0 as well as this > patch does. > > What do you think? Agree. I took out the "reset vac_count", in error, when I restructured the vacuum thread for version 2.0. This change seems good to me. (Deserves a test, to validate it, of course!) -- Configure bugmail: http://www.slony.info/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
- Previous message: [Slony1-bugs] [Bug 193] VACUUM works more frequency than vac_frequency?
- Next message: [Slony1-bugs] [Bug 193] VACUUM works more frequency than vac_frequency?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-bugs mailing list