Wed Mar 31 14:40:51 PDT 2010
- Previous message: [Slony1-bugs] [Bug 81] duplicate key sl_nodelock-pkey and duplicate slon(8) processes not detected
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
http://www.slony.info/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81 --- Comment #4 from Christopher Browne <cbbrowne at ca.afilias.info> 2010-03-31 14:40:51 PDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > First reported 08/2008 by Shahaf Abileah, then found by Bill Moran at CFI. > > http://www.mail-archive.com/slony1-general@lists.slony.info/msg02754.html > > http://www.nabble.com/duplicate-key-sl_nodelock-pkey-td22246434.html The report by Shahaf Abileah doesn't seem to me to indicate an error; if you try to run a slon on 2 servers, then there's no way to find, via /usr/bin/ps, that there were two instances. That case doesn't seem like a bug to me - it looks instead like the slon is working correctly. The only possible change would be to catch the exception and give a more explicit warning to the effect that "it looks like you have a slon running already!" Bill Moran's report isn't about the same thing. In his case, the attempt to start another slon leads to the same symptom (e.g. - slon complains that it can't get the exclusive lock on the tuple). The *problem*, however, seems to be that the "old" slon has gotten somehow 'wedged,' and I'd think it likely that the problem is that it's waiting for a lock to be granted. What's likely necessary to diagnose the issue is a query against pg_locks on the node being managed showing what the "stalled" connection is waiting on. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.slony.info/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
- Previous message: [Slony1-bugs] [Bug 81] duplicate key sl_nodelock-pkey and duplicate slon(8) processes not detected
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-bugs mailing list