Tue Jul 27 11:55:26 PDT 2010
- Previous message: [Slony1-bugs] [Bug 122] bad error message: subscribe a set with no paths to a dropped node
- Next message: [Slony1-bugs] [Bug 145] New: Document Mistake
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
http://www.slony.info/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=133 --- Comment #2 from Steve Singer <ssinger at ca.afilias.info> 2010-07-27 11:55:26 PDT --- I am worried that marking that we can't just ignore+mark confirmed the subscribe set event on nodes where the set does not exist in sl_set. node 5 would have no way of knowing if their is no row in sl_set because a DROP SET has already been processed or if it is because the CREATE SET has not yet been received by node 5. Both the create set and the drop set will be coming from the origin but the subscribe set could be coming from a receiver. We could try to 'remmeber' the set after a DROP SET for some period of time/messages but what would that period be? An arbitrary value would only delay the issue. You could remember all old sets, We could try to make the subscribe set come from the origin not from the provider. This would mean that it comes from the same place as the create/drop set commands but that will have implications elsewhere. Ideas welcome -- Configure bugmail: http://www.slony.info/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
- Previous message: [Slony1-bugs] [Bug 122] bad error message: subscribe a set with no paths to a dropped node
- Next message: [Slony1-bugs] [Bug 145] New: Document Mistake
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-bugs mailing list